In recent decades various Pauline scholars have proposed fresh readings of Paul, usually labelled “anti-imperial” that are anxious to point out the critical potential of Pauline theology over against a problematic history of the use of Pauline texts such as Romans 13:1-7 to support unjust political rulers.
Between a strictly historical approach to texts with a problematic history and hermeneutical approaches that are driven too much by contemporary anxieties, I propose a third way of reading Paul’s texts in the broader horizon of two proposals of contemporary political theologians. Conversing with the works of John Howard Yoder and Oliver O’Donovan has helped me to sharpen up the concepts of what is the political, what we mean by portraying the church as a political community and what might be variations of re-configuring political authority in the light of Christ’s Lordship.
My provisional conclusions are that Paul translates the Lordship of Christ primarily into ecclesiological categories. The church, the community under ultimate and final authority nevertheless affirms and needs worldly political authority. The link between the Lordship of Christ and the rulers of this world is at best implicit in the texts I observe (Romans 13:1-7 and Philippians 2 and 3) and at its worst non-existent. There is no free standing political Christology apart from ecclesiological reflections. Paul’s way of linking things leaves some awkward gaps for us but could also help us to unlearn familiar categories and explore new ones.
